Founders, operators and advisors across six countries on the specific thing Feasy Pro made possible — from surviving investor Q&A to knowing whether a hire was affordable.
The model had grown by accretion — a tab per question, formulas referencing formulas, and nobody except its author able to open it safely. Moving to structured assumptions meant unit sales, personnel and financing finally lived in the same place.
I stopped babysitting a 40-tab spreadsheet the week we switched. Unit sales, people, and financing finally live in one place — and the P&L updates without me rewriting formulas.
Mei ChenThe pitch was never the hard part; the questions afterwards were. Having runway, margins and break-even already computed from the same model that produced the statements turned a stressful exchange into a short one.
We walked into our seed round with a Forecast Report that looked board-ready. Investors asked about runway and margins — I answered from Metrics in thirty seconds, not a scramble through cells.
Arjun PatelEvery hiring conversation had turned into a debate about affordability with no shared evidence. Modelling roles with start dates and a burden rate meant the answer arrived before the opinions did.
Hiring used to be a gut call. Now I see cash runway and rev per employee before I open a role. Feasy Pro made the “can we afford this?” conversation boring — in a good way.
Wei ChenMixed retainers and project work are exactly the case where booked revenue and banked cash diverge. Describing both in plain terms — and letting credit terms do the rest — produced something the bank took seriously.
I'm not an accountant. Feasy Pro let me describe retainers and project work in plain English and still get a real cash-flow view. My bank manager actually thanked me for the printout.
Sarah MitchellAdvisory work had become spreadsheet archaeology — every client's model built differently, each one needing to be relearned. A shared engine with separate workspaces removed the rebuild from every engagement.
I manage forecasts for six client companies. Switching them into Feasy Pro cut my model-rebuild time in half — same engine, separate workspaces, and statements that stay consistent when assumptions change.
Lukas BergKeeping a business plan, a deck and a model in sync by hand is a losing game — one always lags. Wiring the plan's financial sections to the live forecast meant a pricing change propagated instead of creating three inconsistent documents.
The Business Plan chapters stay wired to the live numbers. When we updated pricing, the story and the financials moved together — no more pasting screenshots into a deck the night before.
Camille BrooksReady to see the numbers?
No spreadsheets. No accountant required. Just your assumptions — and the complete financial picture that follows.
Three statements · Always in balance · Export anytime